WDCS Briefing – Dolphin Assisted Therapy

 

Introduction

 

Dolphin interaction programmes, from touching and feeding, to swimming in the dolphin's environment, be it captive or wild, are increasing in range and popularity. An understandable love for dolphins may encourage the public to want to get close to them. This desire may stem from the belief that close contact with these special animals can provide, at the very least, a release from day-to-day stresses and boredom and, at the other extreme, some sort of miracle cure for physical and mental illness, and disability. Such beliefs have helped encourage the growth of interaction programmes by both commercial interests and alternative therapists. However, whilst understanding the reasons why the public is keen to engage in such activities, WDCS has several serious concerns about these practices, which are summarised below.

 

Concerns

 

WDCS is increasingly concerned about the growing number of captive ‘Dolphin Assisted Therapy’ (DAT) programmes around the world. We are currently reviewing details of existing and proposed DAT programmes and investigating whether ‘benefits’ claimed by, or on behalf of, patients, using this kind of therapy exceed those claimed of less controversial interactions with pets, horses and other domesticated animals.

 

Confinement in captivity of dolphins and other cetaceans can alter their behaviour so radically that captives cannot depict a true sense of their species. Dolphins are free-living creatures used to travelling many tens of kilometres a day. In captivity they are forced into relative idleness in an artificial environment where their behaviour is controlled and subdued by humans. They are made to interact with species and individuals they would normally avoid in the wild and whose presence may cause them stress and discomfort and who may display aggression towards them or provoke aggressive behaviour in them. Such displays of character may also occur between dolphin and human visitor or trainer. Captive displays can never truly demonstrate the complex lives of dolphins nor the natural environment they are designed to inhabit.

 

These facts are supported by the Australian Senate Select Committee on Animal Welfare, who, in their report of 1985, found that cetaceans in captivity suffered stress, behavioural abnormalities, high mortalities, decreased longevity and breeding problems.

 

Confinement in captivity can seriously compromise the welfare and survival of all types of cetacean. A study was undertaken for the International Marine Mammal Association in 1997 to compare the survival rates of captive and free-ranging cetacean species. This study revealed that the annual survival rate and calculated life expectancy of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins and killer whales were significantly higher than those derived for captives, in each data set.

 

WDCS believes that the arguments against the confinement of cetaceans are so over-whelming, that any proposal to keep them captive, for whatever reason, should be rejected on animal welfare grounds alone.

 

WDCS has a series of well-substantiated concerns about interactions between humans and dolphins in captivity. These concerns, relating to the welfare of humans as well as dolphins, apply equally to DAT. They include the welfare of the animal; the risk of aggression towards people; the potential for disease transmission from human to dolphin or vice versa; the fact that dolphins may be forced into interactions with humans and have little respite from these actions, and the fact that in so many DAT and other interaction programmes, dolphins are captured from the wild and are transported thousands of miles to suffer the effects of confinement in captivity.

 

In November 1999, the Bermudan Ministry of Environment reported that at least two people had been bitten during scheduled encounters swimming with dolphins in a facility in Bermuda. The bites were serious enough to require emergency hospital attention. In August 2000, an 11-year-old child was bitten by a beluga she was interacting with at a marine park in Canada. The injury to her hand required stitches. In June 2003, the Mainichi Shimbun reported that a woman had sued a hotel in Taiji, Japan for injuries she sustained, including several broken bones in her ribcage and back, after a dolphin smashed into her during a swimming-with-dolphins encounter at the hotel.

 

A recent study carried out by WDCS into dolphin/visitor interactions at marine parks in the USA recorded many incidents of aggressive behaviour by captive cetaceans towards human visitors such as threats, biting and butting. This study also raises serious concerns regarding the potential for the transmission of disease between human visitors and captive cetaceans.

 

Dolphin Assisted Therapy research


A paper published in 2003 entitled, ‘Can dolphins heal by ultrasound?’[1] investigated the possibility of dolphins being able to heal by ultrasound. The researchers determined that under very specific circumstances the ultrasound emitted by dolphins could, theoretically, have an affect on biological tissue, in terms of its intensity. However, the other key factor is the duration of exposure. The researchers noted that, on average, the individual patients in the study each received less than ten seconds of ‘ultrasound therapy’ and were therefore able to reject the hypothesis that dolphins exhibited behaviour that resulted in patients’ exposure to ultrasound in doses comparable to those in medical treatments.

 

Another study evaluated research into the effectiveness of DAT for improving the cognitive, physical, or social-emotional behaviours of young children with disabilities.[2] A comprehensive review of six DAT studies concluded: “The studies included in this synthesis are so plagued with methodological flaws that claims that the reported outcomes are due to dolphin assisted therapy may be erroneous” and further that: “the results of the synthesis do not support the notion that using interactions with dolphins is any more effective than other reinforcers for improving child-learning or social-emotional development... Therefore, the outcomes of the studies cannot conclusively be attributed to the intervention [of DAT].” The researcher, Humphries, also concluded that: “Claims of the effectiveness of using dolphins as a procedure for improving the behaviours of young children with disabilities are therefore not supported by available research evidence.”

 

Despite claims from the advocates of DAT, there remains no concrete evidence for the long-term benefits of this type of therapy.

 

Recommendations

 

It is essential that in any Animal Assisted Therapy programme the health and welfare of both the humans and the animals involved are paramount. As an absolute minimum, Animal Assisted Therapy programmes should incorporate the involvement of medical, veterinary and psychology professionals.

 

Due to:

  • the considerable potential for detrimental effects to both humans and dolphins during DAT programmes;
  • the fact that viable alternative therapy options exist;
  • the fact that DAT remains a totally unregulated industry;

 

WDCS recommends that the practice of dolphin assisted therapy with captive dolphins is terminated.

 

 

WDCS, Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, Brookfield House, 38 St. Paul Street, Chippenham, SN15 1LJ, UK.
Email: info@wdcs.org Website: www.wdcs.org Tel: + 44 1249 449 500 Fax: + 44 1249 449 501. Reg. Charity No. 1014705

WDCS is the global voice for the protection of whales, dolphins and their environment and also has offices in Argentina, Australia, Germany and the USA.

 

Retour Thérapies



[1] Brensing, K.; Linke, K. and Todt, D. 2003. Can dolphins heal by ultrasound? Journal of Theoretical Biology 225 99-105

[2] Humphries, T.L. 2003. Effectiveness of Dolphin-Assisted Therapy as a Behavioral Intervention for Young Children with Disabilities. Bridges Practice-Based Research Syntheses. Research and Training Center on Early Childhood Development. Volume 1, Number 6. May.